[ad_1]
The disagreement is over the legitimacy of a governance vote that Mango Markets passed in order to retrieve a portion of Eisenberg’s exploit funds. Mango Labs, which is representing the DAO in court, says that contract, which let Eisenberg keep much of his haul in exchange for a promise not to sue him, is void because Mango voters agreed to it under duress.
[ad_2]
Source link
